SAND : Decoupling Sanitization From Fuzzing For Low Overhead

SAND is a novel tool designed to enhance the efficiency of software fuzzing by decoupling sanitization from the fuzzing process.

Fuzzing, a widely used software testing technique, often suffers from overhead caused by sanitizer instrumentation.

SAND addresses this issue by separating the sanitization and fuzzing workflows, allowing for low-overhead and high-performance testing.

Core Functionality

SAND operates by utilizing two separate binaries during its workflow:

  1. Native Binary (Non-Sanitized): This binary is built without any sanitizer instrumentation and is used by SAND to collect coverage data during each fuzzing loop.
  2. Sanitizer Instrumented Binary (Without AFL Instrumentation): This binary includes sanitization but excludes AFL instrumentation. It is used to verify whether interesting inputs trigger sanitizer checks.

By decoupling these processes, SAND reduces the runtime overhead typically associated with sanitizer-enabled fuzzing, while still ensuring comprehensive error detection.

  • sand Branch: Contains the reference implementation used in the paper’s evaluation, forked from AFL++ version 4.05c.
  • upstream Branch: Represents efforts to port SAND to the latest version of AFL++.

To use SAND:

  1. Build the native binary using afl-clang-fast.
  2. Build the sanitizer instrumented binary with AFL_SAN_NO_INST=1 and AFL_USE_ASAN=1.
  3. Run SAND with the following command:
   AFL_NO_UI=1 AFL_SKIP_CPUFREQ=1 afl-fuzz -i <input_dir> -o <output_dir> -a <sanitized_binary> -- <native_binary> -f @@

SAND can be built using Docker for ease of reproduction:

docker build -t sand .

Alternatively, users can follow instructions in the original AFL++ README if Docker is unavailable.

For evaluation reproduction, detailed instructions are provided in the evaluation folder of the repository.

SAND’s approach is simple and adaptable to other fuzzers. For example, it has been applied to Fuzzilli, demonstrating its versatility. SAND represents a significant improvement in fuzzing efficiency by decoupling sanitization from fuzzing.

Its low-overhead design ensures faster execution while maintaining robust error detection capabilities, making it a valuable tool for software testing and security research.

Varshini

Varshini is a Cyber Security expert in Threat Analysis, Vulnerability Assessment, and Research. Passionate about staying ahead of emerging Threats and Technologies.

Recent Posts

groupdel Command in Linux: Remove a Group and Audit Files

The groupdel command in Linux removes a group from the system. It deletes the group's entry from /etc/group and /etc/gshadow,…

10 hours ago

wc Command in Linux: Count Lines, Words, Characters, and Bytes

The wc command in Linux counts lines, words, characters, and bytes in files or standard input. It…

10 hours ago

top Command in Linux: Monitor Processes and Resource Usage

The top command in Linux provides a real-time view of running processes and system resource usage. From…

11 hours ago

usermod Command in Linux: Modify User Accounts and Groups

The usermod command in Linux modifies existing user account attributes. You can use it to manage group…

11 hours ago

sort Command in Linux: Sort Text, Numbers, Columns, and More

The sort command in Linux reads lines from files or standard input and writes them to standard…

1 day ago

wall Command in Linux: Broadcast Messages to Logged-In Users

The wall command in Linux sends a message to the terminals of all currently logged-in users. The…

1 day ago