During the forensic analysis of a Windows machine, you may find the name of a deleted prefetch(Prefetch-Hash-Cracker) file. While its content may not be recoverable, the filename itself is often enough to find the full path of the executable for which the prefetch file was created.
The following fields must be provided:
.pf
extension.There are 3 known prefetch hash functions:
A bodyfile of the volume the executable was executed from.
The bodyfile format is not very restrictive, so there are a lot of variations of it – some of which are not supported. Body files created with fls
and MFTECmd
should work fine.
The mount point of the bodyfile, as underlined below:
0|C:/Users/Peter/Desktop ($FILE_NAME)|62694-48-2|d/d-wx-wx-wx|...
The provided bodyfile is used to get the path of every folder on the volume. The tool appends the provided executable name to each of those paths to create a list of possible full paths for the executable. Each possible full path is then hashed using the provided hash function. If there’s a possible full path for which the result matches the provided hash, that path is outputted.
The following cases are not supported:
svchost.exe
and mmc.exe
/prefetch:#
flagIf the executable name is longer than 29 characters (including the extension), it will be truncated in the prefetch filename. For example, executing this file:
This is a very long file nameSo this part will be truncated.exe
From the C:\Temp
directory on a Windows 10 machine, will result in the creation of this prefetch file:
THIS IS A VERY LONG FILE NAME-D0B882CC.pf
In this case, the executable name cannot be derived from the prefetch filename, so you will not be able to provide it to the tool.
Cybersecurity tools play a critical role in safeguarding digital assets, systems, and networks from malicious…
MODeflattener is a specialized tool designed to reverse OLLVM's control flow flattening obfuscation through static…
"My Awesome List" is a curated collection of tools, libraries, and resources spanning various domains…
CVE-2018-17463, a type confusion vulnerability in Chrome’s V8 JavaScript engine, allowed attackers to execute arbitrary…
The blog post "Chrome Browser Exploitation, Part 1: Introduction to V8 and JavaScript Internals" provides…
The exploitation of CVE-2018-17463, a type confusion vulnerability in Chrome’s V8 JavaScript engine, relies on…