The provided program highlights critical issues within the compiler, exposing both soundness and completeness violations.
These bugs manifest in unexpected behavior during execution and compiler crashes, triggered by seemingly innocuous code changes. This article explores the problem, its symptoms, and implications.
Program Behavior
The program is written in Noir and aims to compute a value, out0, which should consistently return Field(0) regardless of input. However, the actual behavior deviates from expectations:
- If executed as-is, the program returns 
Field(-1)instead of the expectedField(0). - Removing empty 
elseblocks causes a compiler panic with an internal error. - Semantic-equivalent changes to the code—such as modifying conditional checks or rearranging variable declarations—alter the output to the correct 
Field(0). 
The program reveals two types of bugs:
- Compiler Completeness Issue: Removing any empty 
elseblock results in a crash during execution (nargo execute).- The error message indicates an unreachable code path in the compiler’s SSA optimization phase (
inlining.rs:504). This suggests that the compiler fails to handle certain edge cases during instruction inlining. 
 - The error message indicates an unreachable code path in the compiler’s SSA optimization phase (
 - Soundness Violation: The program’s output changes unexpectedly based on minor structural modifications. For example:
- Replacing 
(out0 == out0)with(in0 == in0)or(tmp1 == tmp1)fixes the output. - Moving 
let mut tmp2 : Field = 0;to the top of the program also resolves the issue. - Removing certain conditions or assertions causes unpredictable behavior.
 
 - Replacing 
 
Uncommenting assertions like assert(out0 == 0, "completeness violation"); or assert(out0 != 0, "soundness violation"); further exposes these problems. 
The first assertion fails despite being logically correct, while the second passes erroneously, demonstrating unsound evaluation.
These bugs undermine trust in the compiler’s reliability for critical applications. To reproduce:
- Create a new Noir project (
nargo init). - Replace 
src/main.nrwith the provided code. - Add a 
Prover.tomlfile specifyingin0 = "1". - Run 
nargo execute. 
Currently, there is no known workaround for these issues. Developers must avoid triggering problematic conditions until a fix is implemented.
This program demonstrates severe flaws in the compiler’s handling of edge cases, affecting both correctness and stability. Addressing these issues is crucial for ensuring reliable execution and soundness in Noir-based projects.
	








%20(1).webp)


.webp)