SAND : Decoupling Sanitization From Fuzzing For Low Overhead

SAND is a novel tool designed to enhance the efficiency of software fuzzing by decoupling sanitization from the fuzzing process.

Fuzzing, a widely used software testing technique, often suffers from overhead caused by sanitizer instrumentation.

SAND addresses this issue by separating the sanitization and fuzzing workflows, allowing for low-overhead and high-performance testing.

Core Functionality

SAND operates by utilizing two separate binaries during its workflow:

  1. Native Binary (Non-Sanitized): This binary is built without any sanitizer instrumentation and is used by SAND to collect coverage data during each fuzzing loop.
  2. Sanitizer Instrumented Binary (Without AFL Instrumentation): This binary includes sanitization but excludes AFL instrumentation. It is used to verify whether interesting inputs trigger sanitizer checks.

By decoupling these processes, SAND reduces the runtime overhead typically associated with sanitizer-enabled fuzzing, while still ensuring comprehensive error detection.

  • sand Branch: Contains the reference implementation used in the paper’s evaluation, forked from AFL++ version 4.05c.
  • upstream Branch: Represents efforts to port SAND to the latest version of AFL++.

To use SAND:

  1. Build the native binary using afl-clang-fast.
  2. Build the sanitizer instrumented binary with AFL_SAN_NO_INST=1 and AFL_USE_ASAN=1.
  3. Run SAND with the following command:
   AFL_NO_UI=1 AFL_SKIP_CPUFREQ=1 afl-fuzz -i <input_dir> -o <output_dir> -a <sanitized_binary> -- <native_binary> -f @@

SAND can be built using Docker for ease of reproduction:

docker build -t sand .

Alternatively, users can follow instructions in the original AFL++ README if Docker is unavailable.

For evaluation reproduction, detailed instructions are provided in the evaluation folder of the repository.

SAND’s approach is simple and adaptable to other fuzzers. For example, it has been applied to Fuzzilli, demonstrating its versatility. SAND represents a significant improvement in fuzzing efficiency by decoupling sanitization from fuzzing.

Its low-overhead design ensures faster execution while maintaining robust error detection capabilities, making it a valuable tool for software testing and security research.

Varshini

Varshini is a Cyber Security expert in Threat Analysis, Vulnerability Assessment, and Research. Passionate about staying ahead of emerging Threats and Technologies.

Recent Posts

How AI Puts Data Security at Risk

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is changing how industries operate, automating processes, and driving new innovations. However,…

10 hours ago

The Evolution of Cloud Technology: Where We Started and Where We’re Headed

Image credit:pexels.com If you think back to the early days of personal computing, you probably…

4 days ago

The Evolution of Online Finance Tools In a Tech-Driven World

In an era defined by technological innovation, the way people handle and understand money has…

4 days ago

A Complete Guide to Lenso.ai and Its Reverse Image Search Capabilities

The online world becomes more visually driven with every passing year. Images spread across websites,…

5 days ago

How Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) Work

General Working of a Web Application Firewall (WAF) A Web Application Firewall (WAF) acts as…

1 month ago

How to Send POST Requests Using curl in Linux

How to Send POST Requests Using curl in Linux If you work with APIs, servers,…

1 month ago